...I've
received this text by e-mail from at least 5 different sources during
the last month or so, and there were always with positive words attached
to it. So, I've decided to share it with other "Brazilianists".
Here it is.
During
a debate in an American University, the ex-governor of the Federal
District, Cristovam Buarque, was questioned on his thoughts
on the internationalization of Amazonia. The young American man introduced
his question by saying he expected the answer of a humanist and not
of a Brazilian.This was the answer of Mr.Cristovam Buarque:
"In
fact, as a Brazilian I would simply speak against the internationalization
of Amazonia. As much as our governments have neglected this patrimony,
it is ours.
As
a humanist, assessing the risk of environmental degradation of Amazonia,
I can contemplate its internationalization, as well as of everything
else that is of importance to humanity.
If
Amazonia, in the point of view of humanist ethics, must be internationalized,
the world oil reserves should also be internationalized. Oil is as
important to the well-being of humanity as is Amazonia. Despite that,
the owners of the oil reserves feel they have the right to increase
or decrease oil production and manipulate its price.
In the same fashion, the financial capital of the rich countries should
be internationalized. If Amazonia is a patrimony for all human beings,
it should not be burnt based on the decision of one owner, or of one
country.
The burning of Amazonia is as serious as unemployment caused by arbitrary
decisions of global speculators.
We cannot allow financial reserves to be used to burn out entire countries
in the aftermath of speculation. Before the internationalization of
Amazonia, I would like to see the internationalization of all the
great musems of the world.
The Louvre should not belong only to France. Each museum is
a guardian of the most beautiful pieces produced by human intellect.
One
should not allow this cultural patrimony, in the same way as the natural
patrimony of Amazonia, to be manipulated and destroyed by an act of
a single owner or country.
Not
long ago, a Japanese millionaire decided to have a painting of a great
master buried alongside him.
Prior to that decision, the painting should have been internationalized.
At
present, the United Nations are hosting the Forum of the
Millennium but some heads of state had problem attending due to
difficulties with immigration. For this reason, I think that New York,
as the location of the United Nations headquarters, should
be internationalized. At least Manhattan should belong to all Humanity.
The
same way as Paris, Venice, Rome, London, Rio de Janeiro, Brasilia,
Recife, each city with its unique beauty, its world history, should
belong to the whole world.
If
the United States wants to internationalize Amazonia to avoid the
risk of leaving it in the hands of Brazilians, let us also internationalize
the nuclear arsenals of the United States.
The
United States have shown that they are capable of using nuclear weapons,
which cause destructions thousand times greater than the unfortunate
destruction caused by the burning of the forests in Brazil.
During
political debates, the current candidates to the presidency of the
United States have defended the idea of internationalizing the world
forest reserves in exchange for foreign debt. The foreign debt could
be used to guarantee that each child of the World is allowed to EAT
and attend school.
We
should internationalize children, treating all of them, regardless
their country of origin, as patrimonies that deserve to be preserved
by the whole world.
They
are more deserving than Amazonia.
When
the heads of state start treating the poor children of the world as
patrimonies of humanity, they will not allow these children to work
when they should be studying, to die when they should live.
As
humanist, I accept to defend the internationalization of the world.
But
as long as the world treat me as a Brazilian, I will fight to keep
Amazonia ours.
Ours
alone!