|
Back
The Lost Dimension (Part
1)
Mulling over
the new millennium
By Dr. Paul A. Palayam Roche, PhD.*
‘…And I am only 14!”
were the anguished last words of a girl heard through the
burning inferno recently in Canada’s highways. High-speed
car crashes, pile-ups, and burning debris on highways are
normal occurrence in developed countries.
Faster! Bigger! Higher! Does the
achievement of these aims entail corresponding risks and
dangers? Nature’s compelling laws have a system of
equalization of forces and an immediate rush to maintain
equilibrium—which, for the human condition, is no
different. Most religions profess that this levelling out
is actualized either in the present world, or awaited in
the next. Applied to the methods of locomotion, these laws
mean that risks and dangers rise in direct proportion to
the increase in pace and speed.
The superior technology and the vast
resources at the hands of the industrialized countries give
them an enormous clout and a disproportionate advantage
vis-à-vis other, materially disadvantaged nations.
These advantages translate into greater creature comforts.
Do they provide equal comfort for the soul? Not necessarily.
In the so-called Third World countries, however, taking
care of the soul wisely takes precedence over most other
activities--due to the deeply ingrained mental ethos of
civilizations that have been shaped by custom and culture,
and that have endured and survived millennia. It is a crucial
time to examine some of these attitudes and ways of life
as we approach the new millennium.
Backward?
We often hear people say: “Oh,
they are so backward!!” Are they? Maybe in their appearance
of their houses or huts, or the lack of modern means of
instant communication, or perhaps in the absence of flashy
cars or lavish clothes. But they seem more cheerful, less
stressed out, and perhaps a lot more caring about their
fellow human beings than the more “developed”
people in the West generally are.
If we were to respect only the best
dressed and most fashionable, alas, we would have no use
for Mahatma Gandhi nor a Mother Teresa. Fortunately we still
value nobility of the soul. If we look at the so-called
“successful” people, happiness seems to slip
between the mansions, like someone falling between two chairs.
Sometimes even the selfishness and
ruthlessness that are required to acquire wealth unscrupulously
inures us from any legitimate human sensibility that we
might otherwise demonstrate – except perhaps, in limited
cases, where a sense of remorse might be detected for the
unjust methods adopted in coming into such wealth. Perhaps
this explains why compassion is more at home among and between
individuals and groups that have resisted unjust and patently
uncharitable procedures in achieving worldly success. Furthermore,
they were either not equipped to get on the bandwagon or
assembly line, or had intentionally desisted from it.
Desisting from this “rat race”,
has some invisible advantages. For instance, most of them
are free from the subtle trickery of “credit rating”,
which is a clever ploy by the commercialized consumer society,
which wants us to be indebted to the system that sustains
it. You are only as good as you can borrow as much as possible.
Unless you are a regular debt-paying citizen, you do not
contribute to the well being of the corporate culture that
commands the structures of Western society. Living beyond
one's means is the accepted norm.
You can count on your fingers the
people who are not in debt in Canadian or North American
society. The stress of having a mortgage to pay for a couple
of decades makes you a bonded slave to the lending corporation,
alleviated splendidly by a façade of enforced, systemic
politeness. The foundations of Western economic engines
would collapse if Third World debtor nations were to stop
paying those exorbitant interests and interests on interests,
and declare bankruptcy en masse. The cumulative effect would
be devastating in the West. The rich man might commit suicide
if he has to live on fifty dollars a month. A poor one wouldn’t
notice the difference. (to be continued next edition)
-- By Paul A. Palayam Roche, Ph. D.,
written in late August 2006.
Lecturer, anthropology and culture
studies, sociology, corporate communications, and editing
and publishing. He is Associate Editor of The Brazilianist
Online and is still recovering from two heart attacks and
a stroke.
Readers
are invited to send opinion about this article to editor@brazilianist.com
Back
|
|